Weights & Biases (W&B) is the leading platform for ML experiment tracking, providing tools to log, visualize, and compare model training runs across your team. It automatically captures everything needed to reproduce any experiment.
Key use cases include:
W&B is used by ML teams at companies of all sizes (from solo researchers to OpenAI, NVIDIA, and Microsoft) who need to move beyond spreadsheets and ad-hoc experiment management. It integrates seamlessly with PyTorch, Hugging Face Transformers, Keras, and every major training framework.
pip install wandb
wandb login
# Paste your API key from wandb.ai/authorizeimport wandb
wandb.init(project='my-project')
for epoch in range(10):
loss = train_one_epoch()
wandb.log({'loss': loss, 'epoch': epoch})
wandb.finish()Pricing: Free for personal use (unlimited experiments). Teams plan starts at $50/user/month with collaboration features. Enterprise pricing is custom. See wandb.ai/pricing.
Case studies
Series B fintech, ML platform team
A 12-person ML team had no centralized experiment tracking. Engineers were duplicating experiments unknowingly, spending 30% of compute budget re-running work that had already been done.
Set up W&B with automatic experiment logging, artifact versioning, and sweep configurations. Built a shared model registry with approval workflows and automated comparison dashboards for weekly model reviews.
Duplicate experiments reduced 60%. Compute costs fell 28%. Model deployment frequency increased from twice per quarter to every two weeks. New engineers onboard and contribute meaningful experiments within their first week.
AI startup preparing Series A
A startup fine-tuning open-source LLMs was spending weeks manually tuning LoRA hyperparameters (rank, alpha, dropout, learning rate) with no systematic approach, missing optimal configurations.
Ran W&B Sweeps across 400+ fine-tuning experiments with Bayesian optimization. Each run logged training loss, eval perplexity, GPU utilization, and domain benchmark scores automatically for comparison.
Optimal LoRA configuration found 8x faster than manual search. Final perplexity 18% lower than any manually-tuned config. The sweep methodology became the startup's standard fine-tuning workflow.
Used Weights & Biases professionally?
Add your case study and get discovered by clients.
Submit a case studySubmit a brief and we'll match you with vetted specialists who have proven Weights & Biases experience.